Does it infringe?
Map it, element by element.
An AI claim-charting engine that maps product features against asserted patent claims, for litigation, licensing, and FTO disputes.
Infringement analysis answers a binary question with a non-binary process: does this product practice this claim? Counsel reads the claim, reads the product spec, and maps element to element. Done by hand it's billable hours; done by AI it's hours instead of weeks. Kwintely produces the claim chart, element by element, source by source, evidence by evidence, ready for counsel review.
Cease-and-desist arrived Friday. The asserted patent has 14 elements across the independent claim. Your product manual is 200 pages. Counsel wants the non-infringement claim chart by Wednesday, for the response letter and the litigation hold meeting. The bill clock is already running.
Before Kwintely vs With Kwintely
From description to result in three steps
Input the asserted claim + product
Paste the claim text and the product description, manual, datasheet, or technical specification.
Element-level claim mapping
Each claim element is mapped to product features by context match. Quotes are pulled from the product source for each element.
Receive the claim chart
Element-by-element infringement matrix with quoted product source per element, counsel-ready format.
Four artifacts, one search
Element-by-element claim chart
Each claim element mapped to product features (or absence thereof), counsel-ready for litigation or licensing review.
Non-infringement memo
Structured explanation of where the product does not practice the asserted elements, drop into counsel's response letter.
Source citations per element
Product manuals, datasheets, and source code references mapped to each claim element with quoted passages.
Bidirectional analysis
Run it offensively (their product, your claim) or defensively (your product, their claim), same engine.
What teams ask before they sign.
Can this be used for both defence and assertion?
Yes, bidirectional. Defensively: paste your product spec + the asserted claim, get a non-infringement claim chart. Offensively: paste a target product + your claim, get an infringement claim chart for cease-and-desist or licensing demands. Same engine, two postures. Counsel keeps the legal opinion in both cases; Kwintely handles the element-by-element mapping that drives the argument.
Is the output ready for counsel review?
Every result includes the source document, publication date, similarity score, and the relevant passage quoted verbatim. The output is structured the way an associate-led search would be: ranked, cited, exportable. The AI is a mapping engine; the documents it surfaces are real. Counsel still makes the legal call; Kwintely does the search and citation prep.
How does this fit with my existing patent firm?
Most teams run Kwintely before engaging counsel, to scope the work and narrow the candidate set, then walk into the review with the search prep already done. Counsel spends their hours on judgement and the legal opinion, not on assembling the candidate list.
What about pricing and lock-in?
Three ways to work with Kwintely: the self-serve SaaS platform, scoped research-service projects where our team runs the analysis for you, or the API and MCP data layer for your own tools. Full output runs on a paid plan, the free tier is for trying basic searches, not complete deliverables. See the pricing page for current plans and terms.
Run the experiment, not the procurement.
Bring the asserted claim and the product spec. We'll map them. Counsel writes the brief.
Counsel still signs off
Kwintely produces the structured search; your firm keeps ownership of the legal opinion. Nothing about your existing relationship has to change.
Run it on a real case
Pick the technology you'd already pay counsel to clear. Compare what Kwintely returns against what your firm would charge for. Decide on the second case, not the first.
No lock-in
Free tier covers the first basic experiment. Full output on paid plans. Fixed monthly fee on the way up. The cost of the test is one search.
See Infringement Analysis in action.
Bring the asserted claim and the product spec. We'll map them. Counsel writes the brief.